Everyone recently has seen the video from Jefferson Bethke entitled, "Why I Hate Religion but Love Jesus". If you haven't, take a look at the video that has over 17 million views:
At first, I disagreed with him. I didn't hate the video, or have the angry reaction some people did. But I didn't agree with every point. Jesus doesn't hate religion. He visited the temple when He was on earth. So we shouldn't hate the church. Towards the end, he says that "Religion says do but Jesus says done" and that "Jesus and religion are on opposite spectrums". I don't think so. Jesus says in Matthew 5:17, "Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them." So, he wasn't exactly right on with a couple statements.
But I think Jefferson has gotten a lot of criticism that maybe wasn't so warranted. See, I think we as Christians criticized him too soon. I cannot speak for the poet, but I think maybe this video was more of an evangelistic message rather than for believers. To the world, Christianity is portrayed just like he describes it. Even though Christianity isn't supposed to be that way, I think we see more often than not that in the western world, the majority of Christians are like he describes... Hypocritical, judgmental, and selfish.
I think the church has lost its purpose. I love when he says the church is "not a museum for good people, but a hospital for the broken" and if "grace is water, then the church should be an ocean". See, the American church isn't that way anymore. True religion, the religion that Christ taught, loved, and participated in is not the religion of the church today. He poses the question, "If Jesus came to your church, would they actually let him in?" I think that we see a church and a religion God never intended. And so I agree with him... I hate the religion of the American church. I don't hate true religion. But the religion that Americans have created, I don't think Jesus would've been a fan either.
I think Jefferson Bethke was speaking to the youth of today. I think that he was talking to my generation, those who have experienced this false religion. I think it was more of an evangelistic message than for us believers. I think you have to take it for what it is, and not what we think it is. Overall, I agree with him. And I think it sparks some thinking and discussion that needs to happen in the church.